Day 16 of the Richard Allen trial saw the defense challenge the state’s firearms evidence and introduce digital forensics suggesting Libby German’s phone was tampered with, potentially creating reasonable doubt in the state’s case.
Witness Testimony:
Betsy Blair (Defense Witness):
- Returned to the trails around 1:49 p.m. after a bathroom break. Left the trails for good at 2:14 p.m.
- She was the only car parked at the entrance when she arrived.
- Observed a single, older model car, potentially a Ford (but corrected to likely a Mercury Comet), backed into a parking space facing the road at what she believed to be the old CPS building. She could not recall the color but definitively stated it was not black.
Dr. Stuart Grassian (Defense Expert Witness - Psychiatrist):
- Expert in solitary confinement and its psychological effects on inmates.
- Testified about the potential for delirium, memory loss, and false confessions caused by prolonged solitary confinement, highlighting the harsh conditions Allen faced for 13 months.
- Noted that international standards set a 15-day limit for solitary confinement, far less than Allen’s experience.
- Described the process of memory formation, stating that memories begin as beliefs about what happened, not as visual images, and are therefore susceptible to change and distortion over time.
Dr. Aaron Warren (Defense Expert Witness - Firearms Examiner):
- Reviewed the State’s firearms expert - Melissa Oberg’s - reports and microscopic images but did not conduct his own physical examination of the evidence.
- Discussed the criticism surrounding tool mark analysis but defended the practice as constantly striving for improvement through research and constructive criticism.
- Believes it is inappropriate to compare a cycled round with a fired round due to differences in pressure and other variables.
- Stated Oberg focused on “gross marks” (larger markings) for comparison rather than the more individualized “finer marks,” casting doubt on her conclusion of sufficient agreement.
- Applied the Consecutive Matching Striations (CMS) standard, finding insufficient agreement between the cartridge casing found at the scene and those fired from Allen’s gun, leading to his opinion that the crime scene casing was not ejected from Allen’s gun.
Stacy Eldridge (Defense Expert Witness - Digital Forensics):
- Analyzed the digital extraction data from Libby German’s phone, focusing on Apple Health Data and the event causing the phone to turn on at 4:33 a.m.
- Highlighted the loss of critical data due to multiple power cycles of the phone prior to a full file system extraction being completed. This included data from the phone’s “Power Log,” making it impossible to determine when, or if, the phone was turned off between 5:44 p.m. on February 13th and 4:33 a.m. on February 14th.
- Discovered, through analysis of the “KnowledgeC” database, that a headphone jack (or aux cord) was plugged into the phone at 5:44 p.m. on February 13th and unplugged at 10:32 p.m.
- Just milliseconds prior to the headphones being plugged in, there was an incoming phone call to Libby’s phone.
- Could not provide an explanation as to why the phone did not connect to a tower between 5:44 p.m. on February 13th and 4:33 a.m. on February 14th.
Christopher Cecil (Recalled by the Defense):
- Confirmed he could not decipher the data related to the audio output route in the KnowledgeC database (which Eldridge was able to analyze).
- Could not provide an explanation for the lack of cell tower connection during the critical timeframe.
Brian Bunner (Recalled by the Defense):
- Also could not explain the audio output data in the KnowledgeC database.
Notable Events:
- The defense’s strategy in recalling Cecil was to “lock him in” to his initial findings before he had a chance to prepare a rebuttal for the state based on Eldridge’s testimony.
- The State’s attempt at a rebuttal regarding the audio output data was thwarted when Cecil admitted he had relied on a quick Google search during the break to come up with alternative explanations, which enraged the defense and possibly raised questions about the state’s investigative thoroughness in the minds of the jury.
- Judge Frances Gull denied the State’s motion for a limiting instruction regarding Dr. Grassian’s testimony on the potential for false confessions in cases involving solitary confinement.
- Many juror questions centered on the reliability of the firearms analysis, suggesting it may be a pivotal factor in their deliberations.
Day Summary:
Day 16 presented a potential turning point in the trial with the introduction of surprising digital evidence suggesting someone tampered with Libby German’s phone during the crucial timeframe. The credibility of the State’s firearms evidence was also heavily challenged. The day concluded with the potential for doubt cast on the state’s case due to unprepared witnesses, a lack of comprehensive investigation, and what could be perceived as inadequate scientific analysis, forcing the prosecution to find effective counter-arguments regarding the audio output and tool mark issues to sway the jury towards a conviction.